International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Peer Influence in Internet and Digital Game Addicted Adolescents: Is Internet / Digital Game Addiction Contagious?

Selim Gunuc 1 , *
Author Information
1 Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Education, Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technologies, Post Code: 65000, Van, Turkey
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: June 2017, 6 (2); e33681
  • Published Online: October 10, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: October 8, 2015
  • Revised: May 14, 2016
  • Accepted: June 9, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.33681

To Cite: Gunuc S. Peer Influence in Internet and Digital Game Addicted Adolescents: Is Internet / Digital Game Addiction Contagious?, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2017 ; 6(2):e33681. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.33681.

Copyright © 2016, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). . Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) . 2013;
  • 2. Gunuc S, Kayri M. The profile of internet dependency in turkey and development of internet addiction scale: Study of validity & reliability. Hacettepe Univ J Edu. 2010; 39
  • 3. Zboralski K, Orzechowska A, Talarowska M, Darmosz A, Janiak A, Janiak M, et al. The prevalence of computer and Internet addiction among pupils. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2009; 63: 8-12[PubMed]
  • 4. Poli R, Agrimi E. Internet addiction disorder: prevalence in an Italian student population. Nord J Psychiatry. 2012; 66(1): 55-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Wu X, Chen X, Han J, Meng H, Luo J, Nydegger L, et al. Prevalence and factors of addictive Internet use among adolescents in Wuhan, China: interactions of parental relationship with age and hyperactivity-impulsivity. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4)[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Durkee T, Kaess M, Carli V, Parzer P, Wasserman C, Floderus B, et al. Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and social factors. Addiction. 2012; 107(12): 2210-22[DOI][PubMed]
  • 7. Tsitsika A, Janikian M, Schoenmakers TM, Tzavela EC, Olafsson K, Wojcik S, et al. Internet addictive behavior in adolescence: a cross-sectional study in seven European countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014; 17(8): 528-35[DOI][PubMed]
  • 8. Wolfling K, Muller KW. [Pathological gambling and computergame-addiction. Current state of research regarding two subtypes of behavioural addiction]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2010; 53(4): 306-12[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 1987; 16(5): 427-54[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Bandura A. Social learning theory. 1977;
  • 11. Kobus K. Peers and adolescent smoking. Addiction. 2003; 98 Suppl 1: 37-55[PubMed]
  • 12. Abrams D, Hogg MA. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. 2006;
  • 13. Bahr SJ, Hoffmann JP, Yang X. Parental and peer influences on the risk of adolescent drug use. J Prim Prev. 2005; 26(6): 529-51[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Simons-Morton BG, Farhat T. Recent findings on peer group influences on adolescent smoking. J Prim Prev. 2010; 31(4): 191-208[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Bauman KE, Fisher LA. On the measurement of friend behavior in research on friend influence and selection: Findings from longitudinal studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. J Youth Adolesc. 1986; 15(4): 345-53[DOI][PubMed]
  • 16. Urberg KA, Tolson JM, Degirmencioglu SM. Friendship selection in adolescent friendship networks. J Soc Pers Relatsh. 1998; 15: 703-10
  • 17. Huba GJ, Bentler PM. The role of peer and adult models for drug taking at different stages in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 1980; 9(5): 449-65[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Urberg KA, Luo Q, Pilgrim C, Degirmencioglu SM. A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addict Behav. 2003; 28(7): 1243-56[PubMed]
  • 19. Deng YX, Hu M, Hu GQ, Wang LS, Sun ZQ. [An investigation on the prevalence of internet addiction disorder in middle school students of Hunan province]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2007; 28(5): 445-8[PubMed]
  • 20. Lam CB, Chan DK. The use of cyberpornography by young men in Hong Kong: some psychosocial correlates. Arch Sex Behav. 2007; 36(4): 588-98[DOI][PubMed]
  • 21. Soh PCH, Charlton JP, Chew KW. The influence of parental and peer attachment on Internet usage motives and addiction. . First Monday. 2014; 19(7)
  • 22. Fraenkel JR, Wallen NE, Hyun HH. How to design and evaluate research in education. 2012;
  • 23. Ehrlich K, Carboni I. Inside Social Network Analysis. IBM Technical Report. 2005;
  • 24. Hanneman RA. Introduction to social network methods. 2001;
  • 25. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon. 9(5): 1-5
  • 26. Liu CY, Kuo FY. A study of Internet addiction through the lens of the interpersonal theory. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007; 10(6): 799-804[DOI][PubMed]
  • 27. Aseltine RJ. A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. J Health Soc Behav. 1995; 36(2): 103-21[PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .
Readers' Comments