International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Four Search Engines and their efficacy With Emphasis on Literature Research in Addiction (Prevention and Treatment)

Gholam Reza Samadzadeh 1 , * , Tahereh Rigi 2 and Ali Reza Ganjali 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Library and Medical Information Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, IR Iran
2 Department of Library and Information Sciences, Zahedan Payame Noor University, Zahedan, IR Iran
3 Research Center of Children and Adolscents Health, Health Services, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: March 01, 2013, 1 (4); 166-171
  • Published Online: March 12, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 5, 2012
  • Revised: October 27, 2012
  • Accepted: October 31, 2012
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.6551

To Cite: Samadzadeh G R, Rigi T, Ganjali A R. Comparison of Four Search Engines and their efficacy With Emphasis on Literature Research in Addiction (Prevention and Treatment), Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2013 ; 1(4):166-171. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.6551.

Copyright © 2013, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Davis CHF, Regina DA, Cecilia RA. Manuel SGC. Social Media in Higher Education:A literature review and research directions. 2012;
  • 2. Mirzaie Kh. Research, Researching & Writing. 2009;
  • 3. Mohammadi far D. An Introduction to Database. 2009;
  • 4. Mohammadesmaeil S, Lafzighazi E, Gilvari A. Comparing Search Engines and Meta-search Engines in Pharmaceutics Information Retrieval. J Health System Res. 2009; 2(5)
  • 5. Giustini D, Barsky E. free accessA look at Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scirus: comparisons and recommendations. J Can Health Lib Assoc. 2005; 26(3): 85-9
  • 6. Rahimi Movaghar A, Sharifi V, Mohammadi MR, Farhoudian A. Researches on substance use in Iran; 3 decades evaluation. Addiction. 1998; 93: 9-15
  • 7. Tober M. PubMed, ScienceDirect , Scopus or Google Scholar Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine? Med Laser Application. 2011; 26(3): 139-144
  • 8. Bajpai AK, Davuluri S, Haridas H, Kasliwal G. In search of the right literature search engine(s). 2011; [DOI]
  • 9. Anders ME, Evans DP. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches. Respiratory care. [Comparative Study]. 2010; 55(5): 578-83[PubMed]
  • 10. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008; 22(2): 338-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Walker S. How to search PubMed : An introductory guide for dentists. 2012;
  • 12. What is Science Direct? 2012;
  • 13. What is Google Scholar? 2012;
  • 14. Keller MA. Establishing a Digital Library - Stanford University. 2012;
  • 15. Sood A, Ghosh AK. Literature search using PubMed: an essential tool for practicing evidence-based medicine. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006; 54: 303
  • 16. Boote DN, Beile P. Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res. 2005; 34(6): 3-15
  • 17. Shultz M. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007; 95(4): 442-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Vanhecke TE, Barnes MA, Zimmerman J, Shoichet S. PubMed vs. HighWire Press: a head-to-head comparison of two medical literature search engines. Comput Biol Med. 2007; 37(9): 1252-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Berg A, Fleischer S, Behrens J, et al. Development of two search strategies for literature in MEDLINE-PubMed: nursing diagnoses in the context of evidence-based nursing. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005; 16(2): 26-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Abdoli M, Kousha K. Web Citations vs. ISI and Scopus Citations: Can web be better Impact Indicator for Persian Medical Science Research. Q J Book. 2007; 18(3): 20-30
  • 21. Jacso P. As we may Search-Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Curr Sci-Bangl. 2005; 89(9): 1537
  • 22. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43(3): 478-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Kazempour Z, Ashrafi Rizi H. Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting (A Practical Guide). 2009;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments