International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Comparison of Four Search Engines and their efficacy With Emphasis on Literature Research in Addiction (Prevention and Treatment)

Gholam Reza Samadzadeh 1 , * , Tahereh Rigi 2 and Ali Reza Ganjali 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Library and Medical Information Sciences, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Zahedan, IR Iran
2 Department of Library and Information Sciences, Zahedan Payame Noor University, Zahedan, IR Iran
3 Research Center of Children and Adolscents Health, Health Services, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, IR Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: March 01, 2013, 1 (4); 166-171
  • Published Online: March 12, 2013
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: June 5, 2012
  • Revised: October 27, 2012
  • Accepted: October 31, 2012
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.6551

To Cite: Samadzadeh G R, Rigi T, Ganjali A R. Comparison of Four Search Engines and their efficacy With Emphasis on Literature Research in Addiction (Prevention and Treatment), Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2013 ;1(4):166-171. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.6551.

Abstract
Copyright © 2013, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Davis CHF, Regina DA, Cecilia RA. Manuel SGC. Social Media in Higher Education:A literature review and research directions. 2012;
  • 2. Mirzaie Kh. Research, Researching & Writing. 2009;
  • 3. Mohammadi far D. An Introduction to Database. 2009;
  • 4. Mohammadesmaeil S, Lafzighazi E, Gilvari A. Comparing Search Engines and Meta-search Engines in Pharmaceutics Information Retrieval. J Health System Res. 2009; 2(5)
  • 5. Giustini D, Barsky E. free accessA look at Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scirus: comparisons and recommendations. J Can Health Lib Assoc. 2005; 26(3): 85-9
  • 6. Rahimi Movaghar A, Sharifi V, Mohammadi MR, Farhoudian A. Researches on substance use in Iran; 3 decades evaluation. Addiction. 1998; 93: 9-15
  • 7. Tober M. PubMed, ScienceDirect , Scopus or Google Scholar Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine? Med Laser Application. 2011; 26(3): 139-144
  • 8. Bajpai AK, Davuluri S, Haridas H, Kasliwal G. In search of the right literature search engine(s). 2011; [DOI]
  • 9. Anders ME, Evans DP. Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches. Respiratory care. [Comparative Study]. 2010; 55(5): 578-83[PubMed]
  • 10. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008; 22(2): 338-42[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Walker S. How to search PubMed : An introductory guide for dentists. 2012;
  • 12. What is Science Direct? 2012;
  • 13. What is Google Scholar? 2012;
  • 14. Keller MA. Establishing a Digital Library - Stanford University. 2012;
  • 15. Sood A, Ghosh AK. Literature search using PubMed: an essential tool for practicing evidence-based medicine. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006; 54: 303
  • 16. Boote DN, Beile P. Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educ Res. 2005; 34(6): 3-15
  • 17. Shultz M. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007; 95(4): 442-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 18. Vanhecke TE, Barnes MA, Zimmerman J, Shoichet S. PubMed vs. HighWire Press: a head-to-head comparison of two medical literature search engines. Comput Biol Med. 2007; 37(9): 1252-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 19. Berg A, Fleischer S, Behrens J, et al. Development of two search strategies for literature in MEDLINE-PubMed: nursing diagnoses in the context of evidence-based nursing. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005; 16(2): 26-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 20. Abdoli M, Kousha K. Web Citations vs. ISI and Scopus Citations: Can web be better Impact Indicator for Persian Medical Science Research. Q J Book. 2007; 18(3): 20-30
  • 21. Jacso P. As we may Search-Comparison of Major Features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Curr Sci-Bangl. 2005; 89(9): 1537
  • 22. Freeman MK, Lauderdale SA, Kendrach MG, Woolley TW. Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43(3): 478-84[DOI][PubMed]
  • 23. Kazempour Z, Ashrafi Rizi H. Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting (A Practical Guide). 2009;
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments