International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Social Cognitive Scales Related to Substance Use Behavior in Iranian Adolescents

Ahmad Ali Eslami 1 , Zohre Fathian Dastgerdi 1 , * , Fazlollah Ghofranipour 2 and Firoozeh Mostafavi 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran
2 Department of Health Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: March 2018, 7 (1); e67604
  • Published Online: February 27, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 16, 2016
  • Revised: August 16, 2016
  • Accepted: May 6, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.67604

To Cite: Eslami A A, Fathian Dastgerdi Z, Ghofranipour F, Mostafavi F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Social Cognitive Scales Related to Substance Use Behavior in Iranian Adolescents, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2018 ; 7(1):e67604. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.67604.

Copyright © 2018, International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Flight J. Canadian addiction survey: A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: Substance use by youth. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2007.
  • 2. Schulenberg JE, Merline AC, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Laetz VB. Trajectories of Marijuana Use During the Transition to Adulthood: The Big Picture Based on National Panel Data. J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):255-79. [PubMed: 16534532].
  • 3. Mohammad Poorasl A, Vahidi R, Fakhari A, Rostami F, Dastghiri S. Substance abuse in Iranian high school students. Addict Behav. 2007;32(3):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.008. [PubMed: 16815638].
  • 4. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action; a social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  • 5. Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(10):1129-48. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008. [PubMed: 15350854].
  • 6. Skutle A. The relationship among self-efficacy expectancies, severity of alcohol abuse, and psychological benefits from drinking. Addict Behav. 1999;24(1):87-98. [PubMed: 10189975].
  • 7. Fathian Z, Eslami AA, Ghofranipoor F, Mostafavi F. Psychometric properties of coping and self-efficacy scales related to substance use in a sample of Iranian adolescents. drug,education,prevention andpolicy; 2015.
  • 8. Fathian Z, Eslami AA, Ghofranipour F, Mostafavi F, Ebrahimi AA. The relationship between self-efficacy, coping skill and substance use in adolescent: based on structural equation modeling. J Substance Use. 2015.
  • 9. Sanderson CA. Health psychology. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons; 2004.
  • 10. Sarafino EP. Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. 5th ed. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.
  • 11. Hendershot CS, Witkiewitz K, George WH, Wall TL, Otto JM, Liang T, et al. Evaluating a cognitive model of ALDH2 and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(1):91-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01325.x. [PubMed: 21039630].
  • 12. Tucker JA, Cheong J, Chandler SD, Crawford SM, Simpson CA. Social networks and substance use among at-risk emerging adults living in disadvantaged urban areas in the southern United States: a cross-sectional naturalistic study. Addiction. 2015;110(9):1524-32. doi: 10.1111/add.13010. [PubMed: 26054041].
  • 13. Akers RL, Sellers CS. Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Roxbury; 2004.
  • 14. Karimi S, Biemans H, Lans T, Chizarib M, Mulder M, Naderi K. Understanding role models and gender influences on entrepreneurial intentions among college students. Social Behav Sci. 2013;93:204-14.
  • 15. Department of Health and Human Services . Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Reports of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA); 2012.
  • 16. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DM. Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: the influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):510-20. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.510. [PubMed: 16846326].
  • 17. Emcdda . European monitoring centre for drugs and drug addiction. 2012. Available from:
  • 18. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti F, Burkhart G, Bohrn K, Cuomo L, Gregori D, et al. The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-Dap cluster randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;108(1-2):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.018. [PubMed: 20080363].
  • 19. Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit UOE. Health behaviour in school-aged children: A world health organization cross-nations study [Internet]. 2002. Available from:
  • 20. Griffiths P, Mounteney J, Lopez D, Zobel F, Gotz W. Addiction research centres and the nurturing of creativity. Monitoring the European drug situation: the ongoing challenge for the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Addiction. 2012;107(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03369.x. [PubMed: 21539630].
  • 21. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. [PubMed: 11124735].
  • 22. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5. [PubMed: 3640358].
  • 23. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [PubMed: 17654487].
  • 24. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
  • 25. Savalei V, Bonett DG, Bentler PM. CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515. [PubMed: 25709585].
  • 26. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Thorndike; 1996.
  • 27. Toderi S, Sarchielli G. Psychometric properties of a 36-Item version of the "stress management competency indicator tool". Int J Environment Res Public Health. 2016;13(11).
  • 28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Usingmultivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
  • 29. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7(3):309-19. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
  • 30. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The excercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • 31. Fayers PM, Machin MD. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. doi: 10.1002/9780470024522.
  • 32. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti FD, Versino E, Zambon A, Borraccino A, Lemma P. School-based prevention for illicit drugs use: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(5):385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.012. [PubMed: 18258289].
  • 33. Fishbein M. Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions? Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1075-6. [PubMed: 8712261].
  • 34. Leigh BC. In search of the Seven Dwarves: issues of measurement and meaning in alcohol expectancy research. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(3):361-73. [PubMed: 2660178].
  • 35. Messer D, Meldrum C. Psychology for nurses and health care professionals. London, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1995.
  • 36. Alfonso J, Dunn ME. Differences in the marijuana expectancies of adolescents in relation to marijuana use. Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(6):1009-25. doi: 10.1080/10826080701212386. [PubMed: 17613960].
  • 37. Karademas EC, Kalantzi-Azizi A. The stress process, self-efficacy expectations, and psychological health. Personal Individ Differ. 2004;37(5):1033-43. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.012.
  • 38. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11(2):87-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87. [PubMed: 10163601].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments