International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Social Cognitive Scales Related to Substance Use Behavior in Iranian Adolescents

Ahmad Ali Eslami 1 , Zohre Fathian Dastgerdi 1 , * , Fazlollah Ghofranipour 2 and Firoozeh Mostafavi 1
Authors Information
1 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran
2 Department of Health Education, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: March 2018, 7 (1); e67604
  • Published Online: February 27, 2018
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 16, 2016
  • Revised: August 16, 2016
  • Accepted: May 6, 2017
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.67604

To Cite: Eslami A A, Fathian Dastgerdi Z, Ghofranipour F, Mostafavi F. Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Social Cognitive Scales Related to Substance Use Behavior in Iranian Adolescents, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2018 ;7(1):e67604. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.67604.

Abstract
Copyright © 2018, International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnote
References
  • 1. Flight J. Canadian addiction survey: A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: Substance use by youth. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2007.
  • 2. Schulenberg JE, Merline AC, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Laetz VB. Trajectories of Marijuana Use During the Transition to Adulthood: The Big Picture Based on National Panel Data. J Drug Issues. 2005;35(2):255-79. [PubMed: 16534532].
  • 3. Mohammad Poorasl A, Vahidi R, Fakhari A, Rostami F, Dastghiri S. Substance abuse in Iranian high school students. Addict Behav. 2007;32(3):622-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.05.008. [PubMed: 16815638].
  • 4. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action; a social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall; 1986.
  • 5. Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(10):1129-48. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.08.008. [PubMed: 15350854].
  • 6. Skutle A. The relationship among self-efficacy expectancies, severity of alcohol abuse, and psychological benefits from drinking. Addict Behav. 1999;24(1):87-98. [PubMed: 10189975].
  • 7. Fathian Z, Eslami AA, Ghofranipoor F, Mostafavi F. Psychometric properties of coping and self-efficacy scales related to substance use in a sample of Iranian adolescents. drug,education,prevention andpolicy; 2015.
  • 8. Fathian Z, Eslami AA, Ghofranipour F, Mostafavi F, Ebrahimi AA. The relationship between self-efficacy, coping skill and substance use in adolescent: based on structural equation modeling. J Substance Use. 2015.
  • 9. Sanderson CA. Health psychology. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons; 2004.
  • 10. Sarafino EP. Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. 5th ed. London, United Kingdom: John Wiley and Sons; 2006.
  • 11. Hendershot CS, Witkiewitz K, George WH, Wall TL, Otto JM, Liang T, et al. Evaluating a cognitive model of ALDH2 and drinking behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35(1):91-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01325.x. [PubMed: 21039630].
  • 12. Tucker JA, Cheong J, Chandler SD, Crawford SM, Simpson CA. Social networks and substance use among at-risk emerging adults living in disadvantaged urban areas in the southern United States: a cross-sectional naturalistic study. Addiction. 2015;110(9):1524-32. doi: 10.1111/add.13010. [PubMed: 26054041].
  • 13. Akers RL, Sellers CS. Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Roxbury; 2004.
  • 14. Karimi S, Biemans H, Lans T, Chizarib M, Mulder M, Naderi K. Understanding role models and gender influences on entrepreneurial intentions among college students. Social Behav Sci. 2013;93:204-14.
  • 15. Department of Health and Human Services . Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults: A Report of the Surgeon General. Reports of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA); 2012.
  • 16. Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett RA, Williams DM. Social-cognitive determinants of physical activity: the influence of social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and self-regulation among participants in a church-based health promotion study. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):510-20. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.510. [PubMed: 16846326].
  • 17. Emcdda . European monitoring centre for drugs and drug addiction. 2012. Available from: http://eib.emcdda.europa.eu.
  • 18. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti F, Burkhart G, Bohrn K, Cuomo L, Gregori D, et al. The effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: 18-month follow-up of the EU-Dap cluster randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;108(1-2):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.018. [PubMed: 20080363].
  • 19. Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit UOE. Health behaviour in school-aged children: A world health organization cross-nations study [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.hbsc.org/.
  • 20. Griffiths P, Mounteney J, Lopez D, Zobel F, Gotz W. Addiction research centres and the nurturing of creativity. Monitoring the European drug situation: the ongoing challenge for the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Addiction. 2012;107(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03369.x. [PubMed: 21539630].
  • 21. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-91. [PubMed: 11124735].
  • 22. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-5. [PubMed: 3640358].
  • 23. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. [PubMed: 17654487].
  • 24. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1998.
  • 25. Savalei V, Bonett DG, Bentler PM. CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515. [PubMed: 25709585].
  • 26. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers Thorndike; 1996.
  • 27. Toderi S, Sarchielli G. Psychometric properties of a 36-Item version of the "stress management competency indicator tool". Int J Environment Res Public Health. 2016;13(11).
  • 28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Usingmultivariate statistics. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
  • 29. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7(3):309-19. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
  • 30. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The excercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company; 1997.
  • 31. Fayers PM, Machin MD. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons; 2007. doi: 10.1002/9780470024522.
  • 32. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti FD, Versino E, Zambon A, Borraccino A, Lemma P. School-based prevention for illicit drugs use: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2008;46(5):385-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.11.012. [PubMed: 18258289].
  • 33. Fishbein M. Great expectations, or do we ask too much from community-level interventions? Am J Public Health. 1996;86(8):1075-6. [PubMed: 8712261].
  • 34. Leigh BC. In search of the Seven Dwarves: issues of measurement and meaning in alcohol expectancy research. Psychol Bull. 1989;105(3):361-73. [PubMed: 2660178].
  • 35. Messer D, Meldrum C. Psychology for nurses and health care professionals. London, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1995.
  • 36. Alfonso J, Dunn ME. Differences in the marijuana expectancies of adolescents in relation to marijuana use. Subst Use Misuse. 2007;42(6):1009-25. doi: 10.1080/10826080701212386. [PubMed: 17613960].
  • 37. Karademas EC, Kalantzi-Azizi A. The stress process, self-efficacy expectations, and psychological health. Personal Individ Differ. 2004;37(5):1033-43. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.012.
  • 38. Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11(2):87-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87. [PubMed: 10163601].
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments