Cite Score:
0.86
ELSEVIER SCOPUS

Validation of the Persian Smartphone Addiction Scale Among Tehran University Students, Iran

AUTHORS

Ali Kheradmand ORCID 1 , Elham Sadat Amirlatifi ORCID 2 , * , Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi ORCID 3 , Azadeh Mazaheri Meybodi 1

AUTHORS INFORMATION

1 Taleghani Hospital Research Development Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

2 School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

3 Department of Community Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran

How to Cite: Kheradmand A, Amirlatifi E S, Sohrabi M, Mazaheri Meybodi A. Validation of the Persian Smartphone Addiction Scale Among Tehran University Students, Iran, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2019 ; 8(1):e81176. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.81176.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: 8 (1); e81176
Published Online: March 18, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: June 23, 2018
Revised: March 6, 2019
Accepted: March 9, 2019
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Smartphone addiction is a recent phenomenon which has been increasing tremendously as new applications are being published, especially in Southeast Asia. In Iran, smartphone users are estimated to be around 46 million people and are increasing day by day.

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of persian smartphone addiction scale (PSAS) among students of Tehran universities, Iran.

Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017. The PSAS and Internet addiction test (IAT), which has been already validated in Iran, were completed by 200 students studying at Tehran universities who were selected by the multistage random sampling method

Results: A comparison was made between SAS and IAT in order to find out the concurrent validity. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.7 (P = 0.00), showing a strong positive correlation between PSAS and Persian IAT. The optimal cutoff score was more than 106 for at-risk individuals by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 80% and 86%, respectively, and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.93 for the total scale. Test-retest reliability of PSAS was high, with an interclass correlation of 0.996. Sample adequacy for factor analysis as represented by Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (0.92) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (P = 0.00), indicating that factor analysis was useful.

Conclusions: PSAS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating smartphone addiction in the Iranian population.

Keywords

Smart Phone Behavior Addictive Validation Studies University Psychometrics

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

With numerous applications, smartphones provide their users web-based communication, business, education, entertainment, and clinical utilization. Given their assortment of capacities and usability, the number worldwide users was in excess of 1.08 billion in 2012, and it is expanding at a rapid rate. However, smartphones can be harmful when used excessively (1). For instance, uncontrolled smartphone utilization can cause maladaptive behavioral difficulties found in impulse control disorders or pathological gambling; it can impede school or work, diminish academic ability, decrease real-life social interaction and result in relationship issues. It can also lead to health problems such as blurred vision and pain in the wrists or neck (2, 3).

Addiction is a phenomenon described by tolerance, withdrawal, dependence, and social problems, and researchers have proposed the idea of “smartphone addiction”. In spite of the fact that smartphone addiction is generally a new idea and has not been mentioned in the latest version of the diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders (DSM-V), investigations have been performed to address the adverse effects of cellphone dependence. Furthermore, DSM-V has confirmed the concept of behavioral addiction through gambling disorder in the “substance-related and addictive behavior” category and accepted the research criteria for game addiction (4).

In Iran, there are no official reports regarding the number of smartphone users, but it is estimated that there are at least 40 million smartphones in the country (5). Recent data also showed that there are some 40 million active social media users, constituting almost half of the population (6).

However, the issue of smartphone addiction has not been studied so far in Iran. Since this problem is prominent in the youth, especially in university students, it can cause numerous problems in occupational and academic performances and interpersonal relationships; thus, it seems necessary to investigate smartphone dependency in this population (7, 8). To this end, a scale should be validated to evaluate smartphone addiction among the Iranian population.

The first scale for smartphone dependency was created by Kwon et al. and includes 33 items and has been stated to be reliable, with good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.967). The concurrent validity of the six subscales of this tool was appropriate (9).

Since smartphone addiction has similar characteristics to Internet addiction, Internet addiction test (IAT) can be used to develop a smartphone addiction test. First, smartphone addiction scale (SAS) was created base on the K-scale, a 40-item scale for identifying Internet addiction among the Korean juvenile population. Then, 10 items on the specific characteristics of smartphones were added. After final analysis, the SAS consisting of 33 items was prepared (9).

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the SAS (PSAS), which could help future studies on smartphone addiction in the Iranian population.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. Study Design

We performed this cross-sectional study at Shahid Beheshti Medical University (SBMU) in 2017. Initially, the English version of SAS (9) was translated into Persian by a bilingual translator, and then it was back translated to English by another translator, in order to establish the accuracy of the translation. Therefore, all mismatches between the original version and the back-translated were one rectified. This was how the first revision of the Persian SAS was prepared.

Afterwards, the first revision was distributed among 20 medical university students as pilot volunteers to examine its face validity. Then, inappropriate phrases and terms were eliminated and replaced according to the participants’ comments, which resulted in the final revision of the Persian SAS questionnaire.

The final revision of the PSAS was studied by a group of 20 psychiatrists and a Professor of Community Medicine, who were familiar with psychometric tools, to evaluate the sufficiency of semantic equivalence.

Some slight changes were made to some items; for instance, social networks like Twitter and Facebook were replaced with Telegram and Instagram due to their higher popularity in Iran. However, no items were eliminated or added.

The PSAS and IAT, which has been already validated in Iran (10), were completed by 200 students from Tehran universities. The sociodemographic variables (i.e., age, gender, major, and educational degree), were collected by a researcher-made checklist. Meanwhile, information regarding the usage of mobile Internet, social networks, and game applications was gathered.

3.2. Participants

A total of 200 university students from different faculties in Tehran were selected with the multistage cluster sampling method. A written informed consent was obtained from all the participants once we explained the research objectives to them. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti Medical University (2017, 309).

3.3. Instruments
3.3.1. Smartphone Addiction Scale

SAS is a scale for smartphone addiction that comprises six factors and 33 items, rated using a six-point Likert scale (i.e., from 1: strongly disagree to 6: strongly agree) primarily based on self-reporting. The six factors are positive expectation, daily-life disturbance, Internet-based relationship, overuse, withdrawal, and tolerance. The six subscales’ scores are summed up to yield a total SAS score. The minimum and maximum SAS scores ranges from 48 to 288, with higher scores suggesting more severe dependency. The Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was 0.967. The correlation between the subscales of SAS and Young scale (Y-scale) was estimated and the results showed that all the subscales were positively related to those of Y-scale (9, 11).

3.3.2. Internet Addiction Test

IAT is the most popular instrument for diagnosing Internet addiction, which was initially created by Young in 1998 (9). the Persian version of Young’s IAT has perfect psychometric properties and is a valid and reliable tool for psychological and psychiatric studies in order to distinguish normal Internet users from Internet addicts. In previous investigations, content and convergent validity, internal consistency (α = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.82) have been determined and all were acceptable. The best cutoff point for the questionnaire was 46 (10).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All the analyses were conducted by SPSS version 22.0. Descriptive statistics were used for sociodemographic characteristics of the participants. Concurrent validity between PSAS and the Persian IAT was established by Pearson’s correlation. Basically, the ideal SAS cutoff score for at-risk cases was determined by coordinate points, whilst the score for the Persian version of IAT was greater than 46 (10). At this cutoff point, based on ROC analyses, specificity and sensitivity were at an optimal level. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha, and test-retest reliability was confirming for the external consistency of the scale. Principal component analysis and varimax with Kaiser normalization were used for establishing construct validity. Factor loading of more than 0.30 and eigenvalue greater than 1 were considered for factor analysis (12).

4. Results

Out of 200 participants, 124 (62%) were female. The majority of the students were single and aged between 20 and 29 years and had high levels of education. Also, 97.5% of the respondents had access to the Internet on their smartphones. What’s more, 98% used social network services, and 55% used game applications. Table 1 shows the sociodemographic characteristics of the participants, the mean score of SAS in our study was 94 with the standard error of 26.97 (min score = 36, max score = 158).

Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Population (N = 200)
VariableNo. (%)
Gender
Female124 (62)
Male76 (38)
Age
< 2012 (6)
20 - 29136 (68)
30 - 3935 (17.5)
> 4017 (8.5)
Marital status
Single154 (77)
Married46 (23)
Major
Medical sciences136 (68)
Engineering10 (5)
Basic sciences6 (3)
Humanities and social sciences48 (24)
Educational degree
Advanced diploma10 (5)
Bachelor’s30 (15)
Master’s30 (15)
Doctorate130 (65)
Mobile Internet
Yes195 (97.5)
No5 (2.5)
Social network services
Yes196 (98)
No4 (2)
Game applications
Yes110 (55)
No90 (45)
4.1. Concurrent Validity

A comparison was made between SAS and IAT in order to find out the concurrent validity of the PSAS. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.7 (P = 0.00), showing a significant positive correlation between PSAS and Persian IAT.

4.2. Cutoff Point, Specificity, and Sensitivity

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of SAS, information was analyzed by ROC curve in SPSS software. The area under the curve (AUC) for the ROC curve was calculated at 0.915 (95% CI = 0.869 - 0.962). The ideal cutoff score for recognizing smartphone dependent patient was more than 106, with a high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (86%). (Figure 1 and Table 2) Based on a score of 106, the prevalence of at-risk persons for smartphone addiction was 32% in our study.

Receiver operating characteristic curve
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve
Table 2. Cutoff Point, Specificity, and Sensitivity According to Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
CutoffSensitivity1-Specificity
90.500.9780.426
91.500.9780.400
92.500.9780.381
93.500.9780.361
94.500.9560.335
95.500.9330.323
96.500.9330.303
97.500.9330.284
98.500.9110.265
99.500.8670.239
100.500.8670.219
101.500.8440.213
102.500.8440.206
103.500.8440.194
104.500.8000.181
105.500.8000.161
106.500.8000.148
107.500.7780.129
108.500.7780.116
109.500.7560.116
110.500.7560.090
111.500.7110.084
112.500.6890.071
113.500.6890.065
114.500.6440.058
115.500.6440.039
116.500.6440.032
118.500.6220.026
122.000.6000.019
4.3. Internal Consistency

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the whole instrument was 0.93, and the separate coefficients for the subscales of daily-life disturbance, positive expectation, withdrawal, Internet-based relationship, overuse, and tolerance were 0.817, 0.876, 0.833, 0.806, 0.749 and 0.767, respectively. The alpha coefficient would have changed between 0.936 and 0.940 if any items were deleted (Table 3).

Table 3. Cronbach’s Alpha if an Item Was Deleted in the Persian Smartphone Addiction Scale
Scale Mean if Item DeletedScale Variance if Item DeletedCorrected Item-Total CorrelationCronbach’s Alpha if Item Deleted
q190.58686.3660.5400.938
q290.48689.1350.5150.938
q391.52695.9500.4230.939
q491.39698.6410.3580.940
q591.37689.0170.5140.938
q690.67694.2140.4650.938
q790.83688.2320.5430.938
q891.44696.1570.4790.938
q991.34689.9420.5470.938
q1092.07693.9450.5570.938
q1191.78682.5850.6110.937
q1291.78690.5850.5580.938
q1391.90688.9950.6030.937
q1490.55671.1240.6670.936
q1590.89674.7110.7280.936
q1691.46675.9080.7090.936
q1791.59681.6100.6210.937
q1891.49680.6630.6210.937
q1991.94700.4990.3480.940
q2090.48704.9040.3000.940
q2191.91697.6100.4710.938
q2291.70675.2060.6730.936
q2392.15696.0980.5190.938
q2490.81675.1830.6200.937
q2590.04674.2650.6680.936
q2692.27698.9600.5320.938
q2789.99702.5680.3220.940
q2890.37676.8860.5250.938
q2990.40672.7740.6570.936
q3091.13670.2240.7350.936
q3191.38688.0550.5570.938
q3290.17689.5350.4530.939
q3391.02667.4120.6920.936
4.4. External Consistency

PSAS was completed again after a two-week interval by 70 the study samples. Comparison of mean scores was made by paired t-test (Table 4), yielding a correlation coefficient of 0.997 which shows no significant differences (P = 0.394). This indicates that the test-retest reliability of the PSAS is high. Interclass correlation was 0.996 (95% confidence interval = 0.994 - 0.998).

Table 4. Test-Retest Reliability
Mean ± SDNMean Standard Error
Test97.40 ± 24.862702.972
Retest97.61 ± 24.033702.873
4.5. Factor Analysis

Sample adequacy for factor analysis as represented by Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (0.92) and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was significant (P = 0.00), indicating factor analysis was useful. Six factors were extracted (Eigenvalue > 1.00) via principal component analysis. Varimax rotation with Kaiser normalization explained 62.85% of the total variance (Table 5) This result was approximately compatible with those of the original SAS (9).

Table 5. Factor Analysis of the Persian Version of Smartphone Addiction Scalea
Question No.Components
OveruseWithdrawalTolerancePositive ExpectationCyberspace-Oriented RelationshipDaily Life Disturbance
Q10.616
Q20.522
Q30.820
Q40.765
Q50.671
Q60.755
Q70.799
Q80.716
Q90.756
Q100.672
Q110.717
Q120.498
Q130.721
Q140.489
Q150.533
Q160.418
Q170.610
Q180.448
Q190.459
Q200.412
Q210.814
Q220.501
Q230.799
Q240.487
Q250.748
Q260.687
Q270.627
Q280.637
Q290.526
Q300.518
Q310.731
Q320.797
Q330.516
Eigenvalue11.7022.8681.9421.6641.3421.225
Variance (%)35.4618.6925.8835.0414.0663.713
Cumulative (%)35.4644.1550.0355.0759.1462.85

aExtraction method: principal component analysis; rotation method: varimax with Kaiser normalization.

5. Discussion

This study was the first attempt to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PSAS. Our results demonstrated that PSAS is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating smartphone dependency in the Iranian population.

This study exhibited that internal consistency, dimensionality, and concurrent and construct validity of the PSAS were desirable. Pearson’s correlation coefficient indicated a strong positive correlation between PSAS and IAT. The results of Ching et al. study in the Malay population indicated that all SAS subscales, except positive expectation, correlated with the Malay version of the IAT (13). The six dominant components that explained a large proportion of the variability of the SAS-M were similar to those of the original SAS. In the present study and original SAS, the components consisted of daily-life disturbance, positive expectation, withdrawal, Internet-based relationship, overuse, and tolerance. The factors of the Persian scale were not parallel to original scale in factor analysis. This can be the result of the differences between the Iranian and Korean samples.

All the PSAS subscales were significantly related to the Persian version of the IAT, showing that PSAS had good concurrent validity.

Although our study population were homogenous as all subjects were students of Tehran Universities with a narrower range of occupation and education compared to the wide range in the original SAS study, all the components were the same as those in the original SAS.

PSAS had good internal consistency; the Cronbach’s alpha was 0.93 in this study and the separate coefficients for the daily-life disturbance, positive expectation, withdrawal, Internet-based relationship, overuse, and tolerance subscales of PSAS were 0.817, 0.876, 0.833, 0.806, 0.749 and 0.767, respectively. Demirci et al. reported a similar finding (Cronbach’s alpha coefficient = 0.947) in the validation of the Turkish version of the SAS (14). Also, Ching et al. reported an internal consistency of 0.94 in the Malay version of SAS (13).

Test-retest reliability of the PSAS was high and its interclass correlation was 0.996, which are even better than those of the original version of the SAS and the Malay version of SAS with the interclass correlations of 0.95 (13).

The PSAS had good external consistency. Lin et al. examined the test-retest reliability of SAS among 85 participants, which yielded intraclass correlations of 0.80 - 0.91 (P < 0.001) (14).

In this study, ROC analysis determined the score of 106 as the cutoff point, with a test sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 86%. In the Malay population, the optimal cutoff point for smartphone addiction was 98, while the score for the Malay version of the IAT was more than 43. The prevalence of smartphone addiction in the Malay population was 46.9% based on this cutoff score (13). The difference in outcomes may be due to demographic diversities in the two populations. However, in the present study, considering addiction as a stigma, attempts were made for increasing the specificity of the test to minimize false-positive cases, so a higher score was achieved as the cutoff point.

The prevalence of Internet addiction was 22.5% in our study. This result is similar to the findings of Modara et al. in 2017 in Iran. They showed that Internet addiction rate had increased from 2006 to 2015 in Iran (15).

The prevalence of smartphone addiction was 32%. This percentage varies in studies of different populations. In a survey by Lee, about 11% of African-American college students demonstrated an abnormal state of smartphone addiction and 10% scored a high level of Facebook addiction (16). In Switzerland, smartphone addiction was found in 16.9% of students (17). The prevalence of problematic mobile phone use in British adolescents was 10% (18). Also, it seems that smartphone addiction is highly frequent among students in Tehran universities.

In Asian countries, the overall prevalence of smartphone ownership is 62% (19) and smartphone addiction rate is estimated higher than Iran. In Cha and Seo study, 30.9% of middle school students in Korea were classified as a high-risk group for smartphone addiction (20).

Considering the above-mentioned statistics, it seems that the prevalence of smartphone addiction among students is high. Thus, it is necessary to perform further investigations for identifying high-risk groups and taking some measures to control this phenomenon.

5.1. Limitations

Despite the adequacy of the sample size, the study was conducted among university students without any considerable functional impairments, which makes it difficult to generalize the findings to clinical conditions.

It was not possible to use clinical interviews for the diagnosis of smartphone addiction in this study. Because there are no established criteria for smartphone addiction as indicated by DSM V. However, our findings could be used by future studies to develop other clinical tools for the diagnosis of smartphone addiction.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1. Sim MS, Kim EM. The smart phone use survey. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission Press; 2011.
  • 2. Mok JY, Choi SW, Kim DJ, Choi JS, Lee J, Ahn H, et al. Latent class analysis on Internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:817-28. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S59293. [PubMed: 24899806]. [PubMed Central: PMC4038421].
  • 3. Alejalil N, Davoodi SR. Mobile phone usage and its effects on pedestrians’ distraction. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;6(3). doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.35431.
  • 4. Choi SW, Kim DJ, Choi JS, Ahn H, Choi EJ, Song WY, et al. Comparison of risk and protective factors associated with smartphone addiction and Internet addiction. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):308-14. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.043. [PubMed: 26690626]. [PubMed Central: PMC4712765].
  • 5. Ghasemi Naraghi H. [The number of smartphone users in Iran reaches 40 million]. 2018, [cited 2015 May 13]. Persion. Available from: https://digiato.com/?p=51054.
  • 6. Financial Tribune. [Latest data on iran surge in social media use]. 2019, [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Persian. Available from: https://financialtribune.com/node/81536.
  • 7. Chiu SI. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on taiwanese university student: A mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;34:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.024.
  • 8. Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;57:321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045.
  • 9. Kwon M, Lee JY, Won WY, Park JW, Min JA, Hahn C, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). Plos One. 2013;8(2).
  • 10. Alavi SS, Eslami M, Maracy MR, Najafi M, Jannatifard F, Rezapour H. Psychometric properties of young Internet addiction test. Int J Behav Sci. 2010;4(3):183-9.
  • 11. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12). e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. [PubMed: 24391787]. [PubMed Central: PMC3877074].
  • 12. Institute for Digital Research and Education. A practical introduction to factor analysis: Exploratory factor analysis. UCLA: Statistical consulting group. 2019. Available from: https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-factor-analysis/a-practical-introduction-to-factor-analysis.
  • 13. Ching SM, Yee A, Ramachandran V, Sazlly Lim SM, Wan Sulaiman WA, Foo YL, et al. Validation of a malay version of the smartphone addiction scale among medical students in Malaysia. PLoS One. 2015;10(10). e0139337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139337. [PubMed: 26431511]. [PubMed Central: PMC4592235].
  • 14. Lin YH, Chang LR, Lee YH, Tseng HW, Kuo TB, Chen SH. Development and validation of the smartphone addiction inventory (SPAI). PLoS One. 2014;9(6). e98312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098312. [PubMed: 24896252]. [PubMed Central: PMC4045675].
  • 15. Modara F, Rezaee-Nour J, Sayehmiri N, Maleki F, Aghakhani N, Sayehmiri K, et al. Prevalence of Internet addiction in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addict Health. 2017;9(4):243-52. [PubMed: 30574288]. [PubMed Central: PMC6294487].
  • 16. Lee EB. Too much information: Heavy smartphone and facebook utilization by African American young adults. J Black Stud. 2014;46(1):44-61. doi: 10.1177/0021934714557034.
  • 17. Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299-307. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.037. [PubMed: 26690625]. [PubMed Central: PMC4712764].
  • 18. Lopez-Fernandez O, Honrubia-Serrano L, Freixa-Blanxart M, Gibson W. Prevalence of problematic mobile phone use in British adolescents. Cyber Psychol Behav Soc Network. 2014;17(2):91-8.
  • 19. Mak KK, Lai CM, Watanabe H, Kim DI, Bahar N, Ramos M, et al. Epidemiology of Internet behaviors and addiction among adolescents in six Asian countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(11):720-8. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0139. [PubMed: 25405785].
  • 20. Cha SS, Seo BK. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction in middle school students in Korea: Prevalence, social networking service, and game use. Health Psychol Open. 2018;5(1):2.055102918755E+14. doi: 10.1177/2055102918755046.
  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: