International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction

Published by: Kowsar

Readability and Suitability Assessment of Adolescent Education Material in Preventing Hookah Smoking

Reza Sadeghi 1 , * , Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad 1 , ** , Hossein Fallahzadeh 2 , Mohsen Rezaeian 3 , Reza Bidaki 4 and Narges Khanjani 5
Authors Information
1 Department of Health Education and Promotion, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, IR Iran
2 Departments of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Center of Prevention and Epidemiology of Non-Communicable Disease, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, IR Iran
3 Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Occupational Environmental Research Center, Rafsanjan Medical School, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, IR Iran
4 Research Center of Addiction and Behavioral Sciences, Diabetes Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, IR Iran
5 Neurology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IR Iran
Corresponding Authors:
Article information
  • International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: March 31, 2019, 8 (1); e83117
  • Published Online: March 2, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: August 10, 2018
  • Revised: January 25, 2019
  • Accepted: January 28, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijhrba.83117

To Cite: Sadeghi R, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S S, Fallahzadeh H , Rezaeian M, Bidaki R , et al. Readability and Suitability Assessment of Adolescent Education Material in Preventing Hookah Smoking, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2019 ; 8(1):e83117. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.83117.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Patients and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. Sadeghi R, Mazloomy SS, Hashemi M, Rezaeian M. [The effects of an educational intervention based on the health belief model to enhance HIV-preventive behaviors among male barbers in Sirjan]. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2016;15(3):235-46. Persian.
  • 2. Lindquist LA, Go L, Fleisher J, Jain N, Friesema E, Baker DW. Relationship of health literacy to intentional and unintentional non-adherence of hospital discharge medications. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1886-3. [PubMed: 21971600]. [PubMed Central: PMC3270238].
  • 3. Berkman ND, Davis TC, McCormack L. Health literacy: What is it? J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 2:9-19. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.499985. [PubMed: 20845189].
  • 4. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259-67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.3.259.
  • 5. Oates DJ, Paasche-Orlow MK. Health literacy: Communication strategies to improve patient comprehension of cardiovascular health. Circulation. 2009;119(7):1049-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818468. [PubMed: 19237675].
  • 6. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27 Suppl 3:S227-32. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.27.1.s3.6. [PubMed: 14672383].
  • 7. McKenna K, Tooth L. Client education: A partnership approach for health practitioners. UNSW Press; 2006.
  • 8. Hoffmann T, Ladner Y. Assessing the suitability of written stroke materials: An evaluation of the interrater reliability of the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) checklist. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19(5):417-22. doi: 10.1310/tsr1905-417. [PubMed: 22982829].
  • 9. Rhee RL, Von Feldt JM, Schumacher HR, Merkel PA. Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65(10):1702-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22046. [PubMed: 23687011].
  • 10. Sadeghi R, Mohseni M, Khanjani N. [The effect of an educational intervention according to hygienic belief model in improving care and controlling among patients with hypertension]. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2014;13(4):383-94. Persian.
  • 11. Kassem NOF, Kassem NO, Liles S, Jackson SR, Posis AIB, Chatfield DA, et al. Levels of urine cotinine from hookah smoking and exposure to hookah tobacco secondhand smoke in hookah lounges and homes. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2018;7(1). doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.67601. [PubMed: 29805963]. [PubMed Central: PMC5967845].
  • 12. Mazloomy Mahmoodabad SS, Sadeghi R, Fallahzadeh H, Rezaeian M, Bidaki R, Khanjani N. Validity and reliability of the preventing hookah smoking (PHS) questionnaire in adolescents based on the protection motivation theory. Int J Pediatr. 2018;6(10):8327-37.
  • 13. Jordan HM, Delnevo CD. Emerging tobacco products: Hookah use among New Jersey youth. Prev Med. 2010;51(5):394-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.08.016. [PubMed: 20817023].
  • 14. Martinasek MP, McDermott RJ, Martini L. Waterpipe (hookah) tobacco smoking among youth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2011;41(2):34-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.10.001. [PubMed: 21232693].
  • 15. Hajek P, Etter JF, Benowitz N, Eissenberg T, McRobbie H. Electronic cigarettes: Review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit. Addiction. 2014;109(11):1801-10. doi: 10.1111/add.12659. [PubMed: 25078252]. [PubMed Central: PMC4487785].
  • 16. Ghobadi M, Farrokhi MR, Nakhaee N, Jafari-Sirizi M, Barouni M. Estimation of the cost of smoking-attributable diseases (five selected diseases): A case in Kerman city, Iran, 2014. Addict Health. 2017;9(4):190-8. [PubMed: 30574281]. [PubMed Central: PMC6294483].
  • 17. Kukkadapu T, Filo A, Jia L, Keshavamurthy J, Dillard TA. High price of getting high: Marijuana-induced bullous lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197. A3581.
  • 18. Nolan MB, Kemper KE, Glynn TJ, Hurt RD, Hays JT. Tobacco dependence treatment grants: A collaborative approach to the implementation of WHO tobacco control initiatives. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:8429738. doi: 10.1155/2018/8429738. [PubMed: 29765430]. [PubMed Central: PMC5885333].
  • 19. Borgan SM, Jassim G, Marhoon ZA, Almuqamam MA, Ebrahim MA, Soliman PA. Prevalence of tobacco smoking among health-care physicians in Bahrain. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:931. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-931. [PubMed: 25200373]. [PubMed Central: PMC4165905].
  • 20. Momtazi S, Rawson R. Substance abuse among Iranian high school students. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23(3):221-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328338630d. [PubMed: 20308905]. [PubMed Central: PMC4479403].
  • 21. Dehdari T, Jafari A, Joveyni H. [Students’ perspectives in Tehran University of Medical Sciences about factors affecting smoking hookah]. Razi J Med Sci. 2012;19(95):17-24. Persian.
  • 22. Maziak W, Taleb ZB, Bahelah R, Islam F, Jaber R, Auf R, et al. The global epidemiology of waterpipe smoking. Tob Control. 2015;24(Suppl 1):i3-i12.
  • 23. Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Eissenberg T, Mehrotra P, Azab M, Carroll MV, et al. Waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking among university students in Jordan. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(7):986-92. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0764. [PubMed: 22525279]. [PubMed Central: PMC3570564].
  • 24. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42. [PubMed: 21513547]. [PubMed Central: PMC3096582].
  • 25. Gold J, Aitken CK, Dixon HG, Lim MS, Gouillou M, Spelman T, et al. A randomised controlled trial using mobile advertising to promote safer sex and sun safety to young people. Health Educ Res. 2011;26(5):782-94. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr020. [PubMed: 21447750].
  • 26. Doak C, Doak L, Root J. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippencott; 1996.
  • 27. Lewis S. Implementing the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) to improve health literacy at a rural community health center [dissertation]. East Carolina University; 2014.
  • 28. Hashemi M, Zangiabadi A, Shahdadi H, Sadeghi R. Using BASNEF model: The effect of an educational program on choice the mode of delivery in pregnant women in Sirjan, Iran. Transylv Rev. 2017;1(4).
  • 29. Okuhara T, Ishikawa H, Okada H, Kiuchi T. Readability, suitability and health content assessment of cancer screening announcements in municipal newspapers in Japan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6719-27. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.15.6719. [PubMed: 26434901].
  • 30. Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care. 2008;53(10):1310-5. [PubMed: 18811992].
  • 31. Garnweidner-Holme LM, Dolvik S, Frisvold C, Mosdol A. Suitability assessment of printed dietary guidelines for pregnant women and parents of infants and toddlers from 7 European countries. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(2):146-51 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.10.004. [PubMed: 26603301].
  • 32. Finnie RK, Felder TM, Linder SK, Mullen PD. Beyond reading level: A systematic review of the suitability of cancer education print and Web-based materials. J Cancer Educ. 2010;25(4):497-505. doi: 10.1007/s13187-010-0075-0. [PubMed: 20237884]. [PubMed Central: PMC2933274].

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments