Evaluation of Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole in Oral Candida glabrata Isolates from Drug Addicts

AUTHORS

Narges Golirad 1 , Leila Fozouni ORCID 1 , * , Hamidreza Pordeli 1

1 Department of Biology, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran

How to Cite: Golirad N, Fozouni L, Pordeli H. Evaluation of Susceptibility to Fluconazole and Voriconazole in Oral Candida glabrata Isolates from Drug Addicts, Int J High Risk Behav Addict. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e92807. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.92807.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction: In Press (In Press); e92807
Published Online: November 11, 2019
Article Type: Research Article
Received: May 2, 2019
Revised: July 31, 2019
Accepted: August 26, 2019
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 8 (4)
Crossmark

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Background: Candidiasis is a spectrum of opportunistic fungal diseases that can manifest in drug addicts in various forms, such as stomatitis.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of oral candidiasis caused by Candida glabrata in addicts and examine the susceptibility of isolates to two azoles.

Methods: After taking oral samples from 131 drug addicts suspected of having oral candidiasis, Candida species were identified by culture on chromogenic Candida agar, carbohydrate-assimilation (API test), and polymerase chain reaction. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fluconazole and voriconazole against the isolates were determined using the broth microdilution method. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Overall, 22.2% of the isolates were C. glabrata, which was more abundant among opiate addicts. Among these isolates, 61.1% were resistant to fluconazole and 44.4% were resistant to voriconazole. The MIC90 of voriconazole was 8 µg/mL, which was 16 times less than that of fluconazole (128 µg/mL). There was no statistically significant difference between the frequency of fluconazole- and voriconazole-resistant isolates (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Oral candidiasis was a common problem among drug addicts. In addition, the prevalence of azole-resistant C. glabrata isolates was high among these individuals.

Keywords

Candida glabrata Fluconazole Voriconazole Addiction

Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Background

Increased incidence of candidiasis, its epidemiological changes, and drug resistance highly justify the need to conduct studies on fungal infections. Pathogenic Candida species are found in both humans and animals. According to epidemiological studies, non-albicans Candida species are gradually replacing Candida albicans (1). Candida glabrata, formerly known as Torulopsis glabrata, is an opportunistic pathogenic yeast with a rising prevalence in immunocompromised individuals, such as HIV and cancer patients, transplant recipients, consumers of immunosuppressive drugs, and drug addicts (2).

Drug addiction is a global problem with serious health and financial consequences. Drugs can stimulate the brain’s reward system, causing it to produce excessive dopamine as a pleasure neurotransmitter. Either way, the brain reinforces the behavior of drug use with dopamine-induced pleasure. Addiction is not only an individual aspect but also a social threat. In addition to threats to the physical and mental health of individuals, it has irreparable harm to the social and economic aspects of society. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), drug-related disorders are the problems associated with the use and abuse of drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and other substances that people have to change their thinking, feeling, and behavior (3). Patients with drug addiction have shown to have increased susceptibility to fungal infections. Also, drug abusers with a history of travel may serve as carriers of infection; thus, the fungal infection should be considered in narcotic users (4, 5). In addicts, Candida species can infect the oral cavity or bloodstream, thereby leading to severe infections (6).

Despite the increasing diversity of antifungal drugs, the efficacy of these agents for the treatment of fungal infections is not satisfactory (7). Azoles including fluconazole and voriconazole are among the most important antifungal agents used for the treatment of fungal infections. Voriconazole is commonly used for the treatment of fluconazole-resistant candidiasis (8). The drug affects the activity of cytochrome P450 and inhibits the demethylation of 14-alpha-lanosterol and ergosterol synthesis. This results in ergosterol depletion and accumulation of methylated sterols, which disrupt the cell membrane structure and function (9).

2. Objectives

In this study, considering the drug resistance in fungal infections, we aimed to determine the prevalence of oral candidiasis in addicts and compare the antifungal activity of fluconazole and voriconazole against C. glabrata strains isolated from drug addicts with oral candidiasis in vitro.

3. Methods

In a cross-sectional study, 131 samples (with a 95% confidence interval and a 0.05 alpha error) were studied from Oct 2017 to Dec 2018. The target population was drug addicts that used opium, opium sap, crack, naswar or methamphetamine (not alcohol) suspected of having oral candidiasis and recently admitted to three camps in Golestan Province, north-east of Iran. We selected those higher than 18 years of age. Addicts were identified and diagnosed based on the symptoms of bloodshot eyes, bad breathing, shakes or tremors, frequent bloody noses, or dizziness and headaches according to camps’ psychiatrists and urine/blood tests. Moreover, 131 samples were prepared from non-drug users with oral candidiasis as a control group. The mean age of the subjects was 21 ± 18 years. Moreover, all personal data such as the name and address of them were confidential and samples were identified merely with a special code.

Saliva or oral fluid samples were collected without stimulation. The samples were stored in sterile disposable containers and kept on ice for up to three hours. After a direct microscopic examination, the samples were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar containing chloramphenicol (Quelab, Canada) and incubated at 35ºC for 48 hours. The isolates were identified by methylene blue staining, culture on chromogenic Candida agar, and carbohydrate-assimilation test using the API120C AUX kit. The identification of Candida species was confirmed by molecular evaluation via PCR. The PCR was performed according to the instructions of Candida spp. detection kit (Iranian Gene Fanavar Institute, Iran) using 18S rRNA universal primers (Table 1).

Table 1. Details of Primers Used for Molecular Detection of Candida spp.
Sequence, 5’->3’Length, ntTm, ºCGC, %
Forward primerGCCAGCGAGTATTAACCTTG2058.450.00
Reverse primerATTTCAGCCAATGAGGATGG2056.445.00

The DNA was isolated using glass beads and the phenol-chloroform method. The PCR amplification was carried out in a final reaction volume of 25 µL containing 1 × PCR mix (19.7 µL), 0.3 µL Taq-DNA polymerase, and 5 µL of DNA sample. We also used PCR-negative and positive controls in the experiment. The mixture was vortexed for 3 - 5 seconds. The cycling conditions were as follows: 40 cycles of initial denaturation at 94ºC for 3 minutes, denaturation at 94ºC for 30 seconds, annealing at 52ºC for 30 seconds, extension at 72ºC for one minute, and a final extension at 72ºC for 5 minutes. The results were interpreted based on the kit instruction.

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fluconazole and voriconazole against Candida isolates were determined using the Clinical Laboratory Standards reference method for broth microdilution (NCCLS-M27-A3) (10). To prepare the drug stock solutions at the density of 256 - 0.5 µg/mL and 32 - 0.06 µg/mL for fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively, the powder of each antibiotic (Basel, Switzerland) was dissolved in distilled water and DMSO, in sequence, followed by a 1:100 dilution with RPMI medium (with glutamine, without sodium bicarbonate, pH indicator) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). After preparing a yeast suspension (1 × 103 CFU/mL) from 48-hour cultures, the drug stoke solution and yeast suspension were equally inoculated into the wells of a 96-well plate containing the equal amount of RPMI medium. The lowest concentration of the drugs that inhibited the growth of isolates after 48 hours of incubation at 35ºC was determined as the MIC. The growth rate was assessed in comparison with the positive control (no drug) and negative control (no microorganism) wells.

The MIC results were interpreted according to standard tables (10). For fluconazole, Candida species were considered susceptible, susceptible dose-dependent, and fluconazole-resistant if the MIC values were ≤ 8, 16 - 32, and ≥ 64 µg/mL, respectively. For voriconazole, Candida species were classified as susceptible, susceptible dose-dependent, and resistant if the MIC values were ≤ 1, 2, and ≥ 4 µg/mL, respectively. Data were analyzed by SPSS (version 23) using the t-test and one-way analysis of variance.

4. Results

Of 131 oral samples taken from addicts, 61.8% were identified as positive for Candida species. According to the phenotypic and genotypic assays, 65.4% of the isolates were C. albicans and the rest were non-albicans Candida species.

For analyzing the results after DNA replication, 10 µL of the multiplied product was loaded on the 1.5% agarose gel and TBE × 1 buffer without adding the loading buffer. One DNA marker was associated with samples for determining the size of bands that were then stained with the ethidium bromide gel (0.5 µg/mL). The images were generated by a UV DOC device. The presence of 620 bp fragments compared to the DNA size marker indicated that the test was positive, implying that the identification of non-albicans Candida species was confirmed (Figure 1).

Results of electrophoresis of PCR products of <i>Candida glabrata</i> isolates on 1.5% agarose gel. Columns 1, 6, 29, 40, 51, 59, 60, and 64 contain the 620 bp fragment. C+, Positive control; C-, negative control.
Figure 1. Results of electrophoresis of PCR products of Candida glabrata isolates on 1.5% agarose gel. Columns 1, 6, 29, 40, 51, 59, 60, and 64 contain the 620 bp fragment. C+, Positive control; C-, negative control.

Candida glabrata isolates were the most frequent species (22.22%) among non-albicans species and more frequent among males, those aged 20 - 25 years, and opium addicts (Figure 2).

Relative frequency of <i>Candida glabrata</i> strains isolated from oral samples of addicts based on the type of addiction
Figure 2. Relative frequency of Candida glabrata strains isolated from oral samples of addicts based on the type of addiction

In the control group, 46.6% were identified as Candida species and 12% of the isolates were C. glabrata. There was a significant difference in the frequency of isolates between drug users and non-users (P = 0.01).

The results of antibiotic susceptibility testing and MIC assay showed that 61.1% and 44.4% of C. glabrata isolates were resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively (Figure 3). However, 58% and 43% of C. glabrata isolates in the control group were resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively. There was no significant difference in the azole-resistance rate between drug users and non-users (P > 0.05).

Relative frequency of fluconazole and voriconazole MICs of <i>Candida glabrata</i> isolates
Figure 3. Relative frequency of fluconazole and voriconazole MICs of Candida glabrata isolates

The results of susceptibility testing showed that both fluconazole and voriconazole could inhibit the growth of C. glabrata isolates in a dose-dependent manner. The MIC90 of voriconazole was 8 µg/mL, which was 16 times lower than that of fluconazole (128 µg/mL). However, there was no significant difference between the rates of resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole among isolates from drug-users (Table 2).

Table 2. Comparison of Mean MICs of Fluconazole and Voriconazole Against Candida glabrata Isolates (P Value > 0.05)
AntibioticMean MIC value, µg/mLStandard Deviation
Fluconazole
Resistant6412.1
Susceptible45.7
Voriconazole
Resistant412.1
Susceptible0.56.5

5. Discussion

Candidiasis is the most common fungal infection in the world. Candida is isolated almost invariably from cutaneous lesions, but rarely cultured from the blood or vitreous fluid. The sources of the fungus in these cases remain uncertain. Although some authors have suggested that Candida may contaminate heroin, attempts to culture Candida from heroin have been unsuccessful (11). The recreational use of illicit drugs has aroused concerns that drug abuse-mediated immune dysfunction increases host susceptibility to microbial pathogens. Opiates can also affect the immune system directly through opioid receptors on immune cells leading to reduced phagocytosis and chemotaxis. Endogenous Candida albicans endophthalmitis in injecting drug users has been extensively documented in the literature and is one of the most common ocular complications of drug use (12).

In the present study, we evaluated the prevalence of C. glabrata isolates in oral samples taken from drug addicts. The results showed that about 22% of the isolates were C. glabrata. Disruption of the mucosal defense or immune system can provide suitable conditions for opportunistic pathogens (13). In some studies, non-albicans species such as C. glabrata were the most frequently isolated Candida strains (14).

Previous studies reported C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis as the main causes of mucosal fungal infections (15). Similar to our findings, a study of the oral mucosa of immunocompromised patients in 1998 reported the high prevalence of non-albicans Candida species, including C. glabrata (16).

The importance of non-albicans Candida species has become more profound due to the emergence and development of resistance to antifungal drugs in some of these species, such as C. glabrata and C. krusei, which has led to a dramatic increase in the prevalence of candidiasis. Hence, there is an urgent need for its detection and determining the frequency of resistant Candida species to help develop and implement effective control measures (17).

In our study, 61% and 44.4% of C. glabrata isolates were resistant to fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively. In 2006, researchers stated that 43% of the strains isolated from blood samples of hospitalized patients were C. glabrata. Of these isolates, 23% were voriconazole-resistant and 41% were fluconazole-resistant (18), which are less than the rates observed in our study. This difference can be attributed to the difference in the characteristics of the studied populations, the type of samples taken, the type of infections, and the presence of underlying diseases. This highlights the necessity of determining susceptibility to azoles and other antifungal agents. In some studies, C. glabrata was the least susceptible species to voriconazole. Likewise 60% of C. glabrata isolates were susceptible to fluconazole, and 92%, were inhibited by ≤ 1 µg of voriconazole per mL (19).

Similar to our findings, in a study in Spain on 21 male and female drug addicts, the prevalence of C. albicans and C. glabrata was 67% and 28.9%, respectively (6). However, the mentioned study examined only heroin addicts, while our subjects were addicted to various substances.

In the present study, the MIC90 value of voriconazole was 16 times less than that of fluconazole against these isolates. Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference between voriconazole- and fluconazole-resistant isolates.

It has been suggested that voriconazole breakpoints are dependent on the pharmacodynamic analysis (19), but the pharmacodynamic properties of the antifungal agents are not fully understood. In a study on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters of voriconazole, an AUC24/MIC ratio of 20 at a dose of 200 mg was effective for the treatment of infections caused by C. albicans in a mouse model with MIC of 0.25 µg/mL (20).

A new formulation of antifungal drugs, combination therapy, and the development of new bioactive compounds may improve therapeutic outcomes. Regarding the use of combination therapy for the management of candidiasis, researchers demonstrated that a combination of fluconazole and Silybum marianum extract was four-fold more effective than fluconazole or the extract alone (7).

In general, determining the susceptibility of pathogenic fungi before treatment may be beneficial for improving treatment efficacy and preventing drug overuse and the subsequent drug resistance.

5.1. Conclusions

Our results demonstrated the high prevalence and high rate of drug resistance among non-albicans Candida isolates, particularly C. glabrata, among the studied population of addicts. Given the high prevalence of resistance to fluconazole and voriconazole in these subjects, there might be the need to use higher doses of the drugs for favorable therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, it is proposed to accurately diagnose infections in drug users and exploit combination therapy at low doses or seek novel antifungal agents for the treatment of drug-resistant candidiasis.

Acknowledgements

Footnotes

References

  • 1.

    Panchal P, Katara RK, Mehta RC, Soni ST, Nanera A, Trivedi NA, et al. Microbiological study of various candida species and its antifungal sensitivity testing isolated from antenatal women with vaginitis, in tertiary care teaching hospital, Western India. Int J Microb Res. 2013;5(6):486-9. doi: 10.9735/0975-5276.5.6.486-489.

  • 2.

    Anaissie EJ, McGinnis MR, Pfaller MA. Clinical mycology. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(9):776.

  • 3.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596.

  • 4.

    Hadley C, Haneef Mohamed AW, Singhal A. Central nervous system fungal infection in a young male with a history of intravenous drug abuse and hepatitis C. Radiol Case Rep. 2017;12(3):590-6. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.03.016. [PubMed: 28828132]. [PubMed Central: PMC5551908].

  • 5.

    Ranjana KH, Priyokumar K, Singh TJ, Gupta Ch C, Sharmila L, Singh PN, et al. Disseminated Penicillium marneffei infection among HIV-infected patients in Manipur state, India. J Infect. 2002;45(4):268-71. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2002.1062. [PubMed: 12423616].

  • 6.

    Odds FC, Palacio-Hernanz A, Cuadra J, Sanchez J. Disseminated Candida infection syndrome in heroin addicts--dominance of a single Candida albicans biotype. J Med Microbiol. 1987;23(3):275-7. doi: 10.1099/00222615-23-3-275. [PubMed: 3295247].

  • 7.

    Fozouni L, Palang M. Antifungal effects of silybum marianum extract individually and in combination with fluconazole on clinical Candida isolates in Northern Iran. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2018;22(4). e84803. doi: 10.5812/jkums.84803.

  • 8.

    Ally R, Schurmann D, Kreisel W, Carosi G, Aguirrebengoa K, Dupont B, et al. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter trial of voriconazole and fluconazole in the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(9):1447-54. doi: 10.1086/322653. [PubMed: 11577374].

  • 9.

    Bennett JE, Izumikawa K, Marr KA. Mechanism of increased fluconazole resistance in Candida glabrata during prophylaxis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(5):1773-7. doi: 10.1128/aac.48.5.1773-1777.2004. [PubMed: 15105134]. [PubMed Central: PMC400565].

  • 10.

    Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method For broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. 3rd ed. Pennsylvania: Wayne, PA; 2008.

  • 11.

    Shankland GS, Richardson MD, Dutton GN. Source of infection in candida endophthalmitis in drug addicts. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292(6528):1106-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6528.1106-a. [PubMed: 3084020]. [PubMed Central: PMC1340040].

  • 12.

    Kaushik KS, Kapila K, Praharaj AK. Shooting up: the interface of microbial infections and drug abuse. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60(Pt 4):408-22. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.027540-0. [PubMed: 21389334].

  • 13.

    Kourkoumpetis TK, Velmahos GC, Ziakas PD, Tampakakis E, Manolakaki D, Coleman JJ, et al. The effect of cumulative length of hospital stay on the antifungal resistance of Candida strains isolated from critically ill surgical patients. Mycopathologia. 2011;171(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/s11046-010-9369-3. [PubMed: 20927595]. [PubMed Central: PMC4093797].

  • 14.

    Abu-Elteen KH. Increased incidence of vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by Candida glabrata in Jordan. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2001;54(3):103-7. [PubMed: 11544399].

  • 15.

    Richter SS, Galask RP, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA. Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida species causing vulvovaginitis and epidemiology of recurrent cases. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(5):2155-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2155-2162.2005. [PubMed: 15872235]. [PubMed Central: PMC1153777].

  • 16.

    Miyazaki H, Miyazaki Y, Geber A, Parkinson T, Hitchcock C, Falconer DJ, et al. Fluconazole resistance associated with drug efflux and increased transcription of a drug transporter gene, PDH1, in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(7):1695-701. [PubMed: 9661006]. [PubMed Central: PMC105668].

  • 17.

    Arendrup MC, Pfaller MA; Danish Fungaemia Study Group. Caspofungin Etest susceptibility testing of Candida species: Risk of misclassification of susceptible isolates of C. glabrata and C. krusei when adopting the revised CLSI caspofungin breakpoints. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(7):3965-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00355-12. [PubMed: 22564836]. [PubMed Central: PMC3393381].

  • 18.

    Panackal AA, Gribskov JL, Staab JF, Kirby KA, Rinaldi M, Marr KA. Clinical significance of azole antifungal drug cross-resistance in Candida glabrata. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(5):1740-3. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1740-1743.2006. [PubMed: 16672401]. [PubMed Central: PMC1479212].

  • 19.

    Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Jones RN, Diekema DJ. In vitro activities of ravuconazole and voriconazole compared with those of four approved systemic antifungal agents against 6,970 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(6):1723-7. doi: 10.1128/aac.46.6.1723-1727.2002. [PubMed: 12019081]. [PubMed Central: PMC127275].

  • 20.

    Andes D, Marchillo K, Stamstad T, Conklin R. In vivo pharmacodynamics of a new triazole, ravuconazole, in a murine candidiasis model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(4):1193-9. doi: 10.1128/aac.47.4.1193-1199.2003. [PubMed: 12654646]. [PubMed Central: PMC152484].

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: